4.6 Article

NK cells and γδ+ T cells are phenotypically and functionally defective due to preferential apoptosis in patients with atopic dermatitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 176, 期 12, 页码 7736-7744

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.12.7736

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Innate immune cells mediate a first line of defense against pathogens and determine the nature of subsequent acquired immune responses, mainly by producing profound amounts of cytokines. Given these diverse tasks, it is predictable that defective NK and gamma delta(+) T cell responses could be the underlying mechanism for the immunological alterations observed in atopic dermatitis (AD). Indeed, the frequencies of circulating NK cells and gamma delta(+) T cells were profoundly reduced in AD patients. They also displayed a defective ability to sustain TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma, but not IL-4, production after in vitro stimulation, and the defect was restricted to innate immune cells. Surprisingly, on the depletion of CD14(+) monocytes, this selective impairment of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma production was restored to levels comparable to that observed in controls. Release of IL-10 from monocytes was not a major mechanism of the NK and gamma delta(+) T cell dysfunction. Apoptosis as revealed by annexin V binding, was preferentially observed in NK and gamma delta(+) T cells from AD patients when stimulated in the presence of monocytes, and depletion of monocytes significantly protected these cells from apoptotic cell death. Preferential apoptosis of NK cells by activated monocytes in AD patients was cell-contact-dependent. These results indicate that, once NK and gamma delta(+) T cells in AD patients are in immediate contact with activated monocytes, these cells are specifically targeted for apoptosis, leading to the reduced type 1 cytokine production, thereby directing subsequent acquired immune responses toward a type-2 pattern and increasing susceptibility to infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据