4.7 Article

Fe3O4 and γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for the adsorption of Co2+ from aqueous solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 298, 期 2, 页码 501-507

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.12.057

关键词

adsorption; magnetite; maghemite; cobalt(II); nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adsorption of Co2+ ions from nitrate solutions using iron oxide nanoparticles of magnetite (Fe3O4) and maghemite (gamma-Fe2O3) has been studied. The adsorption of Co2+ ions on the surface of the particles was investigated under different conditions of oxide content, contact time, Solution pH. and initial Co2+ ion concentration. It has been found that the equilibrium can be attained in less than 5 ruin. The maximum loading capacity of Fe3O4 and gamma-Fe2O3 nanoparticles is 5.8 x 10(-5) and 3.7 x 10(-5) mol m(-2), respectively, which are much higher than the previously Studied. iron oxides and conventional ion exchange resins. Co2+ ions were also recovered by dilute nitric acid from the loaded gamma-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 with an efficiency of 86 and 30%. respectively. That has been explained by the different mechanisms by including both the surface and Structural loadings of Co2+ ions. The Surface adsorption of Co2+ on Fe3O4 and gamma-Fe2O3 nanoparticles has been found to have the same mechanism of ion exchange reaction between Co2+ in the solution and proton bonded on the particle Surface. The conditional equilibrium constants of surface 2-adsorption of Co2+ on Fe3O4 and gamma-Fe-O-2(3) nanoparticles have been determined to be log K = -3.3 +/- 0.3 and -3.1 +/- 0.2, respectively. The Structural loading of Co2+ ions into Fe3O4 lattice has been found to be the ion exchange reaction between CO2+ and Fe2+ while that into gamma-Fe2O3 lattice to fill its vacancy. The effect of temperature on the adsorption of Co2+ was also investigated, and the value of enthalpy change was determined to be 19 kJ mol(-1) (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据