4.6 Article

A petite obligate mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae -: Functional mtDNA is lethal in cells lacking the δ subunit of mitochondrial F1-atpase

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 24, 页码 16305-16313

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M513805200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the mitochondrial F1F0-ATP synthase, the nucleus-encoded delta-F1 subunit plays a critical role in coupling the enzyme proton translocating and ATP synthesis activities. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, deletion of the delta subunit gene ( Delta delta) was shown to result in a massive destabilization of the mitochondrial genome ( mitochondrial DNA; mtDNA) in the form of 100% rho(-)/rho degrees petites ( i.e. cells missing a large portion (> 50%) of the mtDNA ( rho(-)) or totally devoid of mtDNA ( rho degrees)). Previous work has suggested that the absence of complete mtDNA ( rho(+)) in Delta delta yeast is a consequence of an uncoupling of the ATP synthase in the form of a passive proton transport through the enzyme ( i. e. not coupled to ATP synthesis). However, it was unclear why or how this ATP synthase defect destabilized the mtDNA. We investigated this question using a nonrespiratory gene ( ARG8(m)) inserted into the mtDNA. We first show that retention of functional mtDNA is lethal to Delta delta yeast. We further show that combined with a nuclear mutation ( Delta atp4) preventing the ATP synthase proton channel assembly, a lack of delta subunit fails to destabilize the mtDNA, and rho(+) Delta delta cells become viable. We conclude that Delta delta yeast cannot survive when it has the ability to synthesize the ATP synthase proton channel. Accordingly, the rho(-)/rho degrees mutation can be viewed as a rescuing event, because this mutation prevents the synthesis of the two mtDNA-encoded subunits ( Atp6p and Atp9p) forming the core of this channel. This is the first report of what we have called a petite obligate mutant of S. cerevisiae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据