4.7 Article

Facilitated skin penetration of lidocaine: Combination of a short-term iontophoresis and microemulsion formulation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 316, 期 1-2, 页码 58-67

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.02.034

关键词

microemulsion; iontophoresis; percutaneous penetration; topical delivery; lidocaine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the potential of the application of a short-term iontophoresis on the topical delivery of lidocaine hydrochloride from a microemulsion-based system. Five- and 10-min durations of anodal iontophoresis applied onto porcine skin were examined in combination with a microemulsion containing 2.5% lidocaine hydrochloride. A similar combination (10-min iontophoresis with microemulsion in the anodal electrode) was also examined in vivo in a rat model. It was shown in vitro that by combining microemulsion application with a 10-min iontophoresis of 1.13 mA/cm(2) electric current density, a significantly increased flux was obtained compared with a combination of aqueous drug solution with the same iontophoresis protocol. In vivo studies revealed that 57.71 +/- 18.65 and 18.43 +/- 9.17 mu g cm(-2) were reached in the epidermis and dermis, respectively, at t=30 min of microemulsion application, when iontophoresis was applied for 10 min. In contrast, the application of aqueous solution-iontophoresis resulted in a relatively lower drug accumulation (21.44 +/- 10.42 and 5.30 +/- 2.25 mu g cm(-2) in the epidermis and dermis, respectively, at t=30) with more rapid clearance of the drug from the skin. Ten-minute application of a low-current electric field on a new topical microemulsion appears to make significant changes in skin permeability. The potential advantages of this procedure include significantly increased flux, accumulation of a large skin drug depot, short lag times, reduced irritation (compared to long-term iontophoresis), simplicity and ease of compliance. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据