4.4 Article

An adenovirus serotype 5 vector with fibers derived from ovine atadenovirus demonstrates CAR-independent tropism and unique biodistribution in mice

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 350, 期 1, 页码 103-115

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.01.037

关键词

gene therapy; adenovirus; targeting; tropism modification; coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR); liver tropism; kidney tropism

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [2R01CA083821] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [1P01HL076540] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many clinically important tissues are refractory to adenovirus (Ad) infection due to negligible levels of the primary Ad5 receptor the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor CAR. Thus, development of novel CAR-independent Ad vectors should lead to therapeutic gain. Ovine atadenovirus type 7, the prototype member of genus Atadenovirus, efficiently transduces CAR-deficient human cells in vitro, and systemic administration of OAdV is not associated with liver sequestration in mice. The penton base of OAdV7 does not contain an RGD motif, implicating the long-shafted fiber molecule as a major structural dictate of OAdV tropism. We hypothesized that replacement of the Ad5 fiber with the OAdV7 fiber would result in an Ad5 vector with CAR-independent tropism in vitro and liver detargeting in vivo. An Ad5 vector displaying the OAdV7 fiber was constructed (Ad5Lucl-OvF) and displayed CAR-independent, enhanced transduction of CAR-deficient human cells. When administered systemically to C57BL/6 mice, Ad5Lucl-OvF reporter gene expression was reduced by 80% in the liver compared to Ad5 and exhibited 50-fold higher gene expression in the kidney than the control vector. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a fiber-pseudotyped Ad vector that simultaneously displays decreased liver uptake and a distinct organ tropism in vivo. This vector may have future utility in murine models of renal disease. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据