4.7 Article

Protein refolding in silico with atom-based statistical potentials and conformational search using a simple genetic algorithm

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 359, 期 5, 页码 1456-1467

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.04.033

关键词

statistical potentials; atom-pair potential; decoy discrimination; implicit solvation; simple genetic algorithm

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM34171] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A distance-dependent atom-pair potential that treats long range and local interactions separately has been developed and optimized to distinguish native protein structures from sets of incorrect or decoy structures. Atoms are divided into 30 types based on chemical properties and relative position in the amino acid side-chains. Several parameters affecting the calculation and evaluation of this statistical potential, such as the reference state, the bin width, cutoff distances between pairs, and the number of residues separating the atom pairs, are adjusted to achieve the best discrimination. The native structure has the lowest energy for 39 of the 40 sets of original ROSETTA decoys (1000 structures per set) and 23 of the 25 improved decoys (similar to 1900 structures per set). Combined with the orientation-dependent backbone hydrogen bonding potential used by ROSETTA and a statistical solvation potential based on the solvent exclusion model of Lazaridis & Karplus, this potential is used as a scoring function for conformational search based on a genetic algorithm method. After unfolding the native structure by changing every phi and psi angle by either 3, 5 or 7 degrees, five small proteins can be efficiently refolded, in some cases to within 0.5 angstrom C-alpha distance matrix error (DME) to the native state. Although no significant correlation is found between the total energy and structural similarity to the native state, a surprisingly strong correlation exists between the radius of gyration and the DME for low energy structures. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据