4.8 Article

A novel calcium silicate based microspheres of repaglinide: In vivo investigations

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 113, 期 2, 页码 111-116

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.005

关键词

repaglinide; calcium silicate; floating drug delivery system; microspheres; sodium pertechnetate; gamma scintigraphy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of the present investigation was to evaluate gastro-retentive performance and pharmacokinetic parameters of optimized floating, microspheres (RgFMCS4) consisting of (i) calcium silicate (CS) as porous carrier; (ii) repaglinide (Rg), an oral hypoglycemic agent; and (iii) Eudragit S (ES) as polymer. The optimized formulation demonstrated favorable in-vitro-floating and drug release characteristics. The gastro-retentive behavior of this optimized formulation was compared with non-floating microspheres (RgNFM) prepared from the identical polymer. Stability test of Tc-99m-labeled formulations were carried out using appropriate standard buffer solutions of pH 2.0, 6.8 and 7.4. The organ distribution study was performed in albino rats in order to measure labeling efficiency of the formulation with Tc-99m. The gamma scintigraphy of the formulations was carried out in albino rabbits to monitor the transit of RgFMCS4 and RgNFM in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Prolonged gastric residence time (GRT) of over 6 h was achieved in all animals for calcium silicate based floating microspheres of Rg. Rg loaded optimized formulation was orally administered to albino rabbits and blood samples were used to determine pharmacokinetic parameters of Rg from floating microspheres, which were compared with pharmacokinetic parameters of the marketed tablet formulation. The relative bioavailability of Rg loaded floating microspheres was found to be increased about 3.17 times in comparison to that of the marketed tablet. The enhanced bioavailability and eliminated half-lives of Rg formulation observed in the present study are attributed to the floating nature of the designed formulations. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据