4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Real transposition provides insight into the effectiveness of gastric bypass surgery

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 88, 期 3, 页码 277-282

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.05.034

关键词

bariatric surgery; obesity surgery; gastrointestinal hormones; GLP-1; ileum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite dramatically increased research efforts to discover cures for the rising health issue of obesity, bariatric (obesity) surgery remains the most effective treatment. Obese people and especially those classified as morbidly obese often suffer from associated co-morbid conditions such as type-II diabetes. In most cases, bariatric surgery results in rapid and sustained decreases in excess body weight. Recent reports have identified significant improvements in glucose homeostasis after surgery that are coincident and often precedent to any measurable weight loss. These studies suggest an inhibition or enhancement of a factor within the intestinal tract that improves glycemia independent of body fat stores. These observations have sparked renewed investigation into the mechanisms underlying successful obesity surgeries such as gastric bypass. It is becoming increasingly clear that restriction and malabsorption are not the only two mechanisms important for inducing long-term weight loss or the improvements in diabetes. Investigating the hypothesis that the distal intestine (ileum) holds additional answers into a third mechanism, I used the model of ileal transposition to help identify endocrine changes in the gut following obesity surgery. This review will explore the model of ileal transposition and speculate on its usefulness as a tool to dissect out additional mechanisms underlying effective obesity surgeries. Also discussed will be the ileal-produced hormone glucagon-like peptide and its role in mediating the improvements in diabetes and weight loss after bariatric surgery. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据