3.8 Article

Genetic polymorphisms and weight loss in obesity:: A randomised trial of hypo-energetic high-versus low-fat diets

期刊

PLOS CLINICAL TRIALS
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010012

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0000477] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [G0000477] Funding Source: Medline
  3. MRC [G0000477] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To study if genes with common single nucleotide polymorphisms ( SNPs) associated with obesity-related phenotypes influence weight loss (WL) in obese individuals treated by a hypo-energetic low-fat or high-fat diet. Design: Randomised, parallel, two-arm, open-label multi-centre trial. Setting: Eight clinical centres in seven European countries. Participants: 771 obese adult individuals. Interventions: 10-wk dietary intervention to hypo-energetic ( - 600 kcal/d) diets with a targeted fat energy of 20%-25% or 40%- 45%, completed in 648 participants. Outcome Measures: WL during the 10 wk in relation to genotypes of 42 SNPs in 26 candidate genes, probably associated with hypothalamic regulation of appetite, efficiency of energy expenditure, regulation of adipocyte differentiation and function, lipid and glucose metabolism, or production of adipocytokines, determined in 642 participants. Results: Compared with the noncarriers of each of the SNPs, and after adjusting for gender, age, baseline weight and centre, heterozygotes showed WL differences that ranged from - 0.6 to 0.8 kg, and homozygotes, from - 0.7 to 3.1 kg. Genotype-dependent additional WL on low-fat diet ranged from 1.9 to - 1.6 kg in heterozygotes, and from 3.8 kg to - 2.1 kg in homozygotes relative to the noncarriers. Considering the multiple testing conducted, none of the associations was statistically significant. Conclusions: Polymorphisms in a panel of obesity-related candidate genes play a minor role, if any, in modulating weight changes induced by a moderate hypo-energetic low-fat or high-fat diet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据