4.7 Article

Clinical and biological features in the prognosis of adrenocortical cancer: Poor outcome of cortisol-secreting tumors in a series of 202 consecutive patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 91, 期 7, 页码 2650-2655

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2005-2730

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. Few reports concerning large and homogeneous series are available. Objective: We aimed to determine the clinical characteristics and outcome of ACC and to identify prognostic factors. Design and Setting: This study is a descriptive and multivariate analysis of a cohort from a single endocrinology center. Patients: A total of 202 consecutive patients with ACC were studied. Results: The sex ratio (female to male) was 2.7. Mean age at diagnosis was 44 +/- 16 yr (range, 11-88 yr). We found that 154 patients (76%) had hypersecreting tumors [mostly cortisol and androgens (47%), cortisol alone (27%), or androgens alone (6%)] and 43 patients (21%) had metastases at diagnosis. At initial staging or during follow-up, 85 patients (42%) had liver metastases, 79 patients (39%) had lung metastases, and 20 patients had bone metastases (10%). The survival rate was 37% at 5 yr. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent prognostic factors associated with shorter survival: older age at diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR), 1.03; P < 0.0001], initial Mac-Farlane extension stages 3 (HR, 4.42; P = 0.005) and 4 (HR, 7.93; P < 0.0001), and cortisol hypersecretion (HR, 3.90; P < 0.0001). Treatment with 1,1-dichlorodiphenildichloroethane (o,p'DDD) in the 3 months after surgery increased the survival rate of patients with cortisol-secreting tumors (HR, 0.40; P = 0.04). Conclusion: This study highlights the better prognosis of ACC diagnosed at a noninvasive local stage, the particularly poor prognosis of patients with cortisol-secreting tumors, and the beneficial effect of o,p'DDD therapy in this subgroup of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据