4.6 Article

Evaluation of immunological paradigms in a virus model: Are dendritic cells critical for antiviral immunity and viral clearance?

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 177, 期 1, 页码 492-500

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.492

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 47800] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have examined the role of dendritic cells (DCs) in the antiviral immune response and viral clearance using a transgenic mouse model (CD11c-diphtheria toxin (DT) receptor GFP) that allows for their conditional ablation in vivo. DT administration systemically ablated conventional and IFN-producing plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) in transgenic, but not nontransgenic littermates, without elimination of splenic macrophages. Unexpectedly, early (12 and 48 h postinfection) viral clearance of vesicular stomatitis virus was normal in DC-depleted mice despite markedly reduced serum titers of type I IFN. DC-depleted mice remained virus-free with the exception of a subset (similar to 30%) that developed overwhelming and fatal brain infections 6 days postinfection. However, DT treatment profoundly inhibited clonal expansion of naive CD8(+) vesicular stomatitis virus-specific T cells without altering the primary Th1 and Th2 cytokine response. Optimal clonal. expansion required pDCs because selective elimination of these cells in vivo with a depleting Ab also suppressed expansion of tetramer(+) cells, although Th1/Th2 cytokine production remained unaltered. Collectively, these data indicate that conventional DCs and to a lesser extent pDCs are critical for proliferation of naive antiviral T cells. However, other components of the primary adaptive immune response (Th1/Th2 cytokines) are essentially normal in the absence of DO, which may account for the efficient viral clearance seen in DC-depleted mice. Thus, sufficient redundancy exists in the immune system to sustain efficient viral clearance despite loss of an APC considered essential for induction of a primary antiviral immune response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据