4.7 Article

Endothelin is a dose-dependent trophic factor and a mitogen in small arteries in vivo

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 71, 期 1, 页码 61-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.02.029

关键词

endothelins; p27(Kip1); vascular remodeling; PI-3 kinase; CDK2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Endothelin (ET) modulates cellular processes relevant to vascular remodeling, but there is still some debate as to the potential of ET to be a trophic factor or a mitogen. Moreover, the signaling of ET in vivo to produce these effects is largely unknown. Methods : H-3-leucine and H-3-thymidine incorporation in rat small mesenteric arteries was studied with several doses of ET-1 (0.1 - 10 pmol/kg/min) administered for 26h in vivo. Results: The EC50 for protein synthesis was four times lower than that of DNA synthesis, with maximal effects around 1 and 3 pmol/kg/min, respectively. At 5 pmol/kg/min, ET enhanced CDK2 activity by reducing the binding of its inhibitor p27(Kip1). In contrast, the binding was enhanced at 0.5 pmol/kg/min. The reduced binding observed at 5 pmol/kg/min could not be explained by changes of p27(Kip1) or CDK2 content. Phosphorylation of p27(Kip1) on serine 10 was significantly reduced at 5 pmol/kg/min ET. Although the phosphomositide 3-kinase pathway was activated, it did not contribute to the protein or DNA synthesis responses. Administration of 1 or 5 pmol/kg/min ET-1 for 28 days increased the thickness and cross-sectional area of the small mesenteric artery due to hypertrophy and hyperplasia, respectively, thus confirming the results obtained in acute conditions. Conclusion: ET modulates P27(Kip1) binding to CDK2, producing hypertrophy at low and hyperplasia at higher concentrations. Taken together, these results suggest that ET can act both as a trophic factor and as a mitogen in an in vivo environment, depending on its local concentration. (c) 2006 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据