4.5 Article

MBNL1 and CUGBP1 modify expanded CUG-induced toxicity in a Drosophila model of myotonic dystrophy type 1

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 15, 期 13, 页码 2138-2145

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddl137

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR45653] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS42179] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a neuromuscular disorder caused by a CTG expansion in the 3' UTR of the dystrophia myotonica protein kinase (DMPK) gene. It has been hypothesized that the pathogenesis in DM1 is triggered by a toxic gain of function of the expanded DMPK RNA. This expanded RNA is retained in nuclear foci where it sequesters and induces alterations in the levels of RNA-binding proteins (RNA-BP). To model DM1 and study the implication of RNA-BP in CUG-induced toxicity, we have generated a Drosophila DM1 model expressing a non-coding mRNA containing 480 interrupted CUG repeats; i.e. [(CUG)(20)CUCGA](24). This (iCUG)(480) transcript accumulates in nuclear foci and its expression leads to muscle wasting and degeneration in Drosophila. We also report that altering the levels of two RNA-BP known to be involved in DM1 pathogenesis, MBNL1 and CUGBP1, modify the (iCUG)(480) degenerative phenotypes. Expanded CUG-induced toxicity in Drosophila is suppressed when MBNL1 expression levels are increased, and enhanced when MBNL1 levels are reduced. In addition, (iCUG)(480) also causes a decrease in the levels of soluble MBNL1 that is sequestered in the CUG-containing nuclear foci. In contrast, increasing the levels of CUGBP1 worsens (iCUG)(480)-induced degeneration even though CUGBP1 distribution is not altered by the expression of the expanded triplet repeat. Our data supports a mechanism for DM1 pathogenesis in which decreased levels of MBNL and increased levels of CUGBP mediate the RNA-induced toxicity observed in DM1. Perhaps more importantly, they also provide proof of the principle that CUG-induced muscle toxicity can be suppressed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据