4.6 Article

Stability of silorane dental monomers in aqueous systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 405-410

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.004

关键词

dental monomers; silorane; diepoxide; oxirane; NMR; stability; hydrolysis; biocompatibility

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE 09696] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Siloranes (silicon-based monomers with oxirane functionality) are investigated as matrix resins for new low shrinkage/ stress dental composites. Compounds containing oxirane groups are known to be reactive with water, which could impart instability to the composite. Objective: To test the stability of siloranes by measuring changes in the chemical structure of the oxirane group in aqueous environments. Methods: Two siloranes (PH-SIL and TET-SIL) and their 1:1 mixture (SIL-MIX) were evaluated (n=2-3). Siloranes were mixed in aqueous solutions with and without 1% tetrahydrofuran (THF) containing either liver esterase or epoxide hydrotase at pH 7.4, or dilute HCl at pH 1.4. The stability of conventional dioxiranes 3,4-epoxycyclohexylmethyl-3,4-epoxycyctohexane carboxylate (ECHM-ECHC), and bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE) were also monitored under similar conditions. NMR was used to estimate the extent of reaction and give structural information about reaction products. Results: Siloranes were found to be stable for 24 h in all aqueous environments tested. In contrast, ECHM-ECHC reacted at pH 1.4 to form species containing oxirane, ester, hydroxyl and carboxylic acid groups. Water hydrolyzed the ester group of ECHM-ECHC in the presence of liver esterase. In the presence of epoxide hydrotase, BADGE oxirane groups were hydrolyzed to diols, hydrolysis ranged from 0 to 34% depending on the aqueous environment. Conclusion: The stability and insolubility of siloranes in biological fluid simulants suggests that these may be more suitable for use in the oral environment than conventional oxirane-functional monomers. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据