4.5 Article

Quantification of cAMP antagonist action in vitro and in living cells

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 85, 期 7, 页码 663-672

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2006.01.009

关键词

PKA; cAMP; agonist; antagonist; AlphaScreen; BRET; surface plasmon resonance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) plays a key role in intracellular signalling. cAMP antagonists, acting as suppressors of PKA activity by preventing PKA-holoenzyme dissociation, have received increasing attention because of their potential use in diagnostics as well as for therapeutic purposes. A large number of cAMP analogs have been described over the last three decades and methodology has been established to monitor cAMP agonists action by either following enzymatic activity or holoenzyme dissociation. This is not the case for cAMP antagonists, where only a few substances have been demonstrated to exhibit effects in the low micromolar range, for example, Rp-8-Br-cAMPS. A main drawback in the development of new compounds is the lack of technologies to assess antagonist action in an in vitro situation as well as in living cells. Here we quantify the effect of several cAMP analogs applying three different biochemical/biophysical assay setups and one in-cell assay. This includes two methods monitoring subunit dissociation in a test tube, namely AlphaScreen, a bead-based proximity assay, and surface plasmon resonance, determining the 2 association and dissociation patterns of the two PKA subunits in real time in response to antagonists. BRET2 performed in living cells in a 96-well format, allows testing for the efficacy of membrane-permeable cAMP analogs based on a genetically engineered cAMP sensor. Using novel and established experimental strategies side by side, the action of cAMP and cAMP analogs was tested on type lot PKA holoenzyme, thus generating methodology to screen drug libraries for potential cAMP antagonists with high accuracy, reproducibility as well as potential for automation. (c) 2006 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据