4.6 Article

Interplay between lipoproteins and bee venom phospholipase A2 in relation to their anti-plasmodium toxicity

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 7, 页码 1493-1506

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M600111-JLR200

关键词

secreted phospholipase A(2); malaria; unsaturated fatty acids; oxidation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously showed that the in vitro intraerythrocytic development of the malarial agent Plasmodium falciparum is strongly inhibited by secreted phospholipases A(2) (sPLA(2)s) from animal venoms. Inhibition is dependent on enzymatic activity and requires the presence of serum lipoproteins in the parasite culture medium. To evaluate the potential involvement of host lipoproteins and sPLA2s in malaria, we investigated the interactions between bee venom phospholipase A(2) (bvPLA(2)), human triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and infected erythrocytes. Even at high enzyme concentration (1003 x IC50), bvPLA(2) binding to Plasmodium-infected or normal erythrocytes was not detected. On the contrary, tight association with lipoproteins was observed through the formation of buoyant bvPLA(2)/lipoprotein complexes. Direct involvement of the hydrolysis lipid products in toxicity was demonstrated. Arachidonic acid (C20:4), linoleic acid (C18:2), and, to a lesser extent, docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6) appeared as the main actors in toxicity. Minimal oxidation of lipoproteins enhanced toxicity of the lipolyzed particles and induced their interaction with infected or normal erythrocytes. Fresh or oxidized lipolyzed lipoproteins induced the parasite degeneration without host cell membrane disruption, ruling out a possible membranolytic action of fatty acids or peroxidation products in the death process. In conclusion, our data enlighten on the capability of secreted PLA(2)s to exert cytotoxicity via the extracellular generation of toxic lipids, and raise the question of whether such mechanisms could be at play in pathophysiological situations such as malaria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据