4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Chronic cannabis use is associated with attention-modulated reduction in prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in healthy humans

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 471-484

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269881105057516

关键词

cannabis use; attention; prepulse inhibition; startle reflex; human

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regardless of a wide research interest the nature of a relationship between cannabis use and schizophrenia is controversial. One of the physiological abnormalities in schizophrenia is attention-modulated deficit in prepulse inhibition (PPI), which is a normal reduction in the startle reflex magnitude when a non-startling stimulus (prepulse) precedes the startling stimulus (pulse). This experiment was designed to determine whether or not otherwise healthy people using cannabis would exhibit attention-modulated deficit in PPI. The startle reflex was recorded in carefully screened healthy humans attending to and ignoring auditory pulse and prepulse stimuli separated by short (20-200 ms) and tong prepulse intervals (1600 ms). In contrast to 12 non-using controls, cannabis use in 16 healthy humans was associated with significant reduction in %PPI white attending to auditory stimuli, but not while ignoring them. The PPI was correlated with the duration of cannabis use but not with the concentration of cannabinoid metabolites in urine and the recency of cannabis use in the preceding 24 hours. Cannabis use was not associated with changes in prepulse facititation of startle reflex magnitude (%PPF) at tong prepulse intervals, prepulse facilitation of startle reflex latency and startle reflex magnitude in the absence of prepulses. These results suggest that chronic, but not acute, use of cannabis is associated with schizophrenia-like disruption in PPI in healthy controls. Such reduction in PPI is attention-dependent and does not reflect a global deficit in sensorimotor gating in cannabis users.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据