4.5 Article

Quantification of healthy follicles in the neonatal and adult mouse ovary: evidence for maintenance of primordial follicle supply

期刊

REPRODUCTION
卷 132, 期 1, 页码 95-109

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.01128

关键词

-

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Now [BREAST CANCER NOW RESEARCH CENTRE] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proliferation and partial meiotic maturation of germ cells in fetal ovaries is believed to establish a finite, non-renewable pool of primordial follicles at birth. The supply of primordial follicles in postnatal life should be depleted during folliculogenesis, either undergoing atresia or surviving to ovulation. Recent studies of mouse ovaries propose that intra- and extraovarian germline stem cells replenish oocytes and form new primordial follicles. We quantified all healthy follicles in C57BL/6 mouse ovaries from day 1 to 200 using unbiased stereological methods, immunolabelling of oocyte meiosis (germ cell nuclear antigen (GCNA)) and ovarian cell proliferation (proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)) and electronmicroscopy. Day I ovaries contained 7924 +/- 1564 (S.E.M.) oocytes or primordial follicles, declining on day 7 to 1987 +/- 203, with 200-800 oocytes ejected from individual ovaries on that day and day 12. Discarded oocytes and those subjacent to the surface epithelium were GCNA-positive indicating their incomplete meiotic maturation. From day 7 to 100 mean numbers of primordial follicles per ovary were not significantly depleted but declined at 200 days to 254 +/- 71. Mean numbers of all healthy follicles per ovary were not significantly different from day 7 to 100 (range 2332 +/- 349-3007 +/- 322). Primordial follicle oocytes were PCNA-negative. Occasional unidentified cells were PCNA-positive with mitotic figures observed in the cortex of day I and 12 ovaries. Although we found no evidence for ovarian germline stem cells, our data support the hypothesis of postnatal follicle renewal in postnatal and adult ovaries of C57BL/6 mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据