4.7 Article

Randomized study combining interferon and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis

期刊

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
卷 73, 期 3, 页码 327-340

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ana.23863

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [UO1NS045719, R21NS41986]
  2. Celgene
  3. Sanofi-Aventis
  4. Acorda
  5. Novartis
  6. EMD Serono
  7. Pfizer
  8. Teva
  9. Teva Neuroscience
  10. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  11. CMSC
  12. MS Monitor
  13. Biogen Idec
  14. Bayer HealthCare
  15. Mesdcape Radiology, Projects in Knowledge
  16. Clayton Foundation for Research
  17. NIH/NINDS
  18. NIH/NIBIB
  19. Consortium MS Centers
  20. USF
  21. Texas Neurological Society
  22. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  23. Medscape CME
  24. University of Buffalo
  25. Serono Symposia International Foundation
  26. University of Utah
  27. NINDS
  28. Prime

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective A double-blind, randomized, controlled study was undertaken to determine whether combined use of interferon -1a (IFN) 30g intramuscularly weekly and glatiramer acetate (GA) 20mg daily is more efficacious than either agent alone in relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis. Methods A total of 1,008 participants were randomized and followed until the last participant enrolled completed 3 years. The primary endpoint was reduction in annualized relapse rate utilizing a strict definition of relapse. Secondary outcomes included time to confirmed disability, Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) score, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics. Results Combination IFN+GA was not superior to the better of the single agents (GA) in risk of relapse. Both the combination therapy and GA were significantly better than IFN in reducing the risk of relapse. The combination was not better than either agent alone in lessening confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale progression or change in MSFC over 36 months. The combination was superior to either agent alone in reducing new lesion activity and accumulation of total lesion volumes. In a post hoc analysis, combination therapy resulted in a higher proportion of participants attaining disease activity-free status (DAFS) compared to either single arm, driven by the MRI results. Interpretation Combining the 2 most commonly prescribed therapies for multiple sclerosis did not produce a significant clinical benefit over 3 years. An effect was seen on some MRI metrics. In a test of comparative efficacy, GA was superior to IFN in reducing the risk of exacerbation. The extension phase for CombiRx will address whether the observed differences in MRI and DAFS findings predict later clinical differences. ANN NEUROL 2013;73:327340

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据