4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

A small dose of hydrogen peroxide enhances tumor necrosis factor-alpha toxicity in inducing human vascular endothelial cell apoptosis: Reversal with propofol

期刊

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 110-116

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000221183.02244.80

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We designed the present study to test the hypothesis that oxygen free radicals can enhance tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha cellular toxicity, which might be reversed by propofol, an anesthetic with antioxidant properties, in human vascular endothelial cell line ECV304. Cultured ECV304 were either not treated, treated with 10 mu M of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), treated with TNF-alpha (40 ng/mL) alone, TNF-alpha in the presence of 10 mu M of H2O2 (H+T), or propofol plus H2O2 for 24 h. Cell viability was measured by lactate dehydrogenate (LDH) assay. Cell apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP) nick end-labeling. The antiapoptotic Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax protein expressions were measured by immunocytochemical analysis. Increase's in apoptosis, Bax, lipid peroxidation product malondialdehyde, LDH, and decreases in Bcl-2, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase were observed in TNF-alpha-treated cells. H2O2 10 mu M did not cause significant lipid peroxidation (0.75 +/- 0.03 nmol/mg of malondialdehyde protein) as compared with control (0.70 +/- 0.04 nmol/mg of malondialclehyde protein) (P > 0.05) but further enhanced TNF-alpha-induced lipid peroxidation, upregulated Bax, and down-regulated Bcl-2 expression and enhanced TNF-alpha-induced cell apoptosis (P < 0.05). Propofol 50 mu M attenuated TNF-alpha and H2O2-induced cell apoptosis, accompanied by decreases in malondialdehyde and LDH production and restoration of Bcl-2 expression. Propofol exerts protective effects against H2O2-enhanced TNF-a cell toxicity by reducing oxidative injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据