4.5 Article

Analysis of a care planning intervention for reducing depression in older people in residential care

期刊

AGING & MENTAL HEALTH
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 394-403

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13607860600638347

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Approximately 40% of older people in residential care have significant symptoms of depression. A training and care-planning approach to reducing depression was implemented for 114 depressed residents living in 14 residential care homes in North Yorkshire, UK. Care staff were offered brief mental health training by community mental health teams for older people. They were then assigned to work individually with residents in implementing the care-planning intervention, which was aimed at alleviating depression and any health, social or emotional factors that might contribute to the resident's depression. Clinically significant improvements in depression scores were associated with implementation of the care-planning intervention as evidenced by changes in scores on the Geriatric Mental State Schedule - Depression Scale. There was evidence of an interaction between the power of the intervention and degree of dementia. These improvements were not accounted for by any changes in psychotropic medication. The training was highly valued by care staff and heads of homes, and they considered that the care-planning intervention represented an improvement in quality of care for all residents, irrespective of levels of dementia. Staff also reported improvements in morale and increased confidence in the caring role as a result of their participation. The limitations of this study are discussed. On the basis of a growing body of evidence, it is argued that there is an urgent need for a suitably powered randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation, to test the cost-effectiveness of personalised care planning interventions aimed at reducing depression in older people in residential care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据