4.8 Article

Inhibition of pulmonary and skeletal metastasis by a transforming growth factor-β type I receptor kinase inhibitor

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 66, 期 13, 页码 6714-6721

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3565

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA 40035, R01 CA 76983, R01 CA 75253, R01 CA 114000] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling has been shown to promote invasion and metastasis in various models of human cancers. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of a TGF-beta type I receptor kinase inhibitor (T beta RI-I) to limit early systemic metastases in an orthotopic xenograft model of lung metastasis and in an intracardiac injection model of experimental bone and lung metastasis using human breast carcinoma MDA-MB-435-F-L cells, a highly metastatic variant of human breast cancer MDA-MB-435 cells, expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). Treatment of the cells with the T beta RI-I had no effect on their growth but blocked TGF-beta-stimulated expression of integrin 003 and cell migration in vitro. Systemic administration of the T beta RI-I via i.p. injection effectively reduced the number and size of the lung metastasis in both orthotopic xenograft and experimental metastasis models with no effects on primary tumor growth rate compared with controls. T beta RI-I treatment also reduced the incidence of widespread early skeletal metastases in the femur, tibia, mandible, and spine detected by whole-body EGFP fluorescence imaging. Tumor burden in femora and tibiae was also reduced after T beta RI-I treatment as detected by histomorphometry analysis compared with the placebo controls. Our results indicate for the first time that abrogation of TGF-beta signaling by systemic administration of the T beta RI-I can inhibit both early lung and bone metastasis in animal model systems and suggest antimetastatic therapeutic potential of the T beta RI-I.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据