4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Anti-fibrotic activity of NK cells in experimental liver injury through killing of activated HSC

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 60-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.12.025

关键词

hepatic stellate cells; hepatic fibrosis; NK cells; lymphocytes; SCID; KIR

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK56621] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: We have investigated the role of natural killer (NK) cells in hepatic fibrogenesis. Mouse NK cells express both inhibitory/activating-killing-immunoglobulin-related-receptors (iKIR/aKIR) specific for Class-I-molecules. Methods: Hepatic fibrosis induced by carbon-tetrachloride (CCl4) was compared between wild-type (WT) male-BALBc; combined-immunodeficiency (SCID, lacking B/T-cells); and SCID-BEIGE-mice (lacking B/T/NK cells), and naive mice. Results: Hepatic fibrosis significantly increased in all CCl4-treated groups. SCID-BEIGE mice had more fibrosis than SCID-mice (P < 0.0001) as assessed by morphometry of sirius-red stained tissue sections. Following fibrosis, hepatic NK cells significantly decreased, the aKIR:iKIR-ratio significantly increased while Class-I expression on HSC decreased (P < 0.001). Both freshly isolated and in situ HSC displayed a significant increase in cellular apoptosis following fibrosis induction. Confocal microscopy demonstrated the direct adhesion of NK cells to HSC in mouse liver sections and in vitro human NK/HSC co-culture. In human HSC there was decreased Class-I expression and increased apoptosis as well, which was further increased following blocking of either HSC-related Class-I or NK-related killer inhibitory receptors. Apoptosis was inhibited by pre-incubation of NK cells with the granzyme inhibitor 3,4-dichloroisocoumarin. Conclusions: During liver injury, NK cells have an anti-fibrotic activity at least in part through stimulation of HSC killing. (c) 2006 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据