4.7 Article

Intravenous Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells for Ischemic Stroke

期刊

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 59-69

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ana.22458

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [N01-HB037163]
  2. Notsew Orm Sands Foundation
  3. [R21 HD060978]
  4. [T32NS04712]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Cellular therapy is an investigational approach for stroke. Mononuclear cells (MNCs) from the bone marrow reduce neurological deficits in animal stroke models. We determined if autologous MNC infusion was feasible and safe in patients with ischemic stroke. Methods: We conducted an open-label prospective study of a bone marrow harvest followed by readministration of autologous MNCs in 10 patients, 18 to 80 years old, with acute middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke. Bone marrow was aspirated from the iliac crest, and MNCs were separated at a Good Manufacturing Practices facility and administered intravenously up to a maximum of 10 million cells/kg. The harvest and infusion had to occur between 24 and 72 hours after stroke. Patients were monitored for 6 months. Results: Bone marrow aspiration was successfully completed in all patients. Eight received 10 million cells/kg, and 2 received >= 7 million cells/kg. There were no significant adverse events related to harvest or infusion. Two patients had infarct expansion between enrollment and harvest and underwent hemicraniectomy after cell infusion. One patient died at 40 days due to a pulmonary embolism related to the stroke. There were no study-related severe adverse events. Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 13 before harvest, 8 at 7 days, and 3 at 6 months. At 6 months, all surviving patients had shifted down by at least 1 point on the modified Rankin Scale compared to day 7. Seven of 10 patients achieved a Barthel Index >= 90. Interpretation: This study suggests that a bone marrow harvest and reinfusion of autologous MNCs were safe and feasible in acute stroke patients. ANN NEUROL 2011;70:59-69

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据