4.7 Article

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging in Ischemic Stroke: Definitions and Thresholds

期刊

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
卷 70, 期 3, 页码 384-401

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ana.22500

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stroke Association [TSA2006/11, SC037789]
  2. Translational Medicine Research Collaboration (TMRC) of University of Aberdeen
  3. Translational Medicine Research Collaboration (TMRC) of University of Dundee
  4. Translational Medicine Research Collaboration (TMRC) of University of Edinburg
  5. Translational Medicine Research Collaboration (TMRC) of University of Glasgow
  6. Scottish Enterprise
  7. Pfizer [NS_EU_082]
  8. Patrick Berthoud Charitable Trust
  9. Scottish Funding Council through the Scottish Imaging Network
  10. TRMC Ltd
  11. Scottish Funding Council
  12. National Institutes of Health Research
  13. Wellcome Trust
  14. Chest Heart and Stroke Scotland [ResFell10/A138] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. Medical Research Council [G0902303] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. MRC [G0902303] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Cerebral perfusion imaging with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) is widely available. The optimum perfusion values to identify tissue at risk of infarction in acute stroke are unclear. We systematically reviewed CT and MR perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We searched for papers on MR or CT perfusion performed <24 hours after stroke that assessed perfusion thresholds, mean perfusion lesion values, or lesion volumes. We extracted definitions and perfusion values. We compared definitions and evaluated perfusion thresholds for nonviable''/ at risk'' and at risk''/'' not at risk tissue'' thresholds. Results: Among 7,152 papers, 69 met inclusion criteria for analysis of definitions (49 MR and 20 CT), 21 MR (n = 551), and 10 CT (n = 266) papers, median sample size 22, provided thresholds. We found multiple definitions for tissue states, eg, tissue at risk, 18; nonviable tissue, 12; 16, no definition. Perfusion parameters varied widely; eg, 9 different MR, 6 different CT parameters for the at risk''/'' not at risk threshold.'' Median threshold values varied up to 4-fold, eg, for the at risk''/'' not at risk threshold,'' median cerebral blood flow ranged from 18 to 37ml/100g/min; mean transit time from 1.8 to 8.3 seconds relative to the contralateral side. The influence of reperfusion and duration of ischemia could not be assessed. Interpretation: CT and MR perfusion imaging viability thresholds in stroke are derived from small numbers of patients, variable perfusion analysis methods and definitions of tissue states. Greater consistency of methods would help determine reliable perfusion viability values for wider clinical use of perfusion imaging. ANN NEUROL 2011;70:384-401

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据