4.5 Article

The potential for enhancement of mouse melanoma metastasis by diagnostic and high-amplitude ultrasound

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1097-1101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.03.013

关键词

diagnostic ultrasound; high-intensity focused ultrasound; ultrasound contrast agent; adverse effects; cancer; metastasis

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB00338] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential for enhancement of the metastatic spread of cells from mouse melanoma tumors was examined for exposure to diagnostic ultrasound (DUS) and high-amplitude ultrasound (HAUS) without and with ultrasound (US) contrast agent. The melanoma cell line B16-D5. which is metastatic specifically to lung, was cultured and implanted on a hind leg of female C57/b16 mice. For DUS, tumors were scanned using 1.5-MHz harmonic B-mode imaging with 1-Hz intermittent frame triggering at 2.1 MPa (equivalent MI = 1.7) in a 37 degrees C water bath. For HAUS, a 1.35-MHz focused transducer directed 1-ms bursts at 5 MPa to the tumor at a 1-Hz rate. A total dose of 1 mL/k-g Optison (R) was injected during exposures. Exposure without contrast agent received the same exposure followed by. the contrast agent with the US off. The primary tumor was removed surgically one day after US. Lungs were removed after four weeks for evaluation of metastases. Experiments involved exposure without and with contrast agent in groups of 20 mice. For DUS. mean counts of 0.8 +/- 0.3 (standard error) and 1.3 +/- 0.9 (P = 0.62) metastases were found for groups exposed without and with contrast. respectively. For HAUS, mean counts of 3.4 +/- 1.2 and 5.9 +/- 1.7 (P = 0.35) metastases were found for groups exposed without and with contrast, respectively. The lack of effect of DUS exposure with contrast confirms a previous finding. However, the HAUS counts and incidence were significantly larger than the DUS results (P < 0.05) in a two-way analysis of variance. This indicates a potential for HAUS to enhance metastasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据