4.7 Article

Seasonal rainfall variations in Spain (1912-2000) and their links to atmospheric circulation

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 94-110

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2005.11.005

关键词

Spain; cluster analysis; principal component analysis; regression analysis; seasonal rainfall; SLP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main aim of the present study is to identify to what degree variability of precipitation in Spain can be attributed to variations in the dominating atmospheric circulation patterns. Statistical models were developed and tested on seasonal precipitation in different regions in Spain during the period 1912-2000. The monthly sea level pressure field (SLP) over the area between the latitudes 30 degrees N and 55 degrees N and longitudes between 25 degrees W and 20 degrees E was used as predictor. Principal components deduced from this field were used as a basis for stepwise multiple regression analysis. The models were developed using even years as a calibration period, while odd years were used as a validation period. Stepwise regression was applied to investigate the relative importance of the predictors. Models reproduce around 68% of the variability in winter precipitation corresponding to western and central Iberian Peninsula, around 20% for Mediterranean coast and 54% for northern coast of Iberian Peninsula. In spring, models reproduce around 57%, 43%, and 27% of the variance for similar regions. In summer and autumn results are worse, although an important fraction of the rainfall variability is captured. The models were then used on the entire period and it is concluded that precipitation changes observed in western Iberian Peninsula during the studied period can mainly be attributed to variations in the SLP field, although topographic effects and/or other causal mechanisms (sea surface temperature, local convective events) must be considered, in addition to SLP field. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据