4.7 Article

Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells reduce interstitial fibrosis but do not delay progression of chronic kidney disease in collagen4A3-deficient mice

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 121-129

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001521

关键词

mesenchymal stem cells; kidney; fibrosis; chronic kidney disease; progression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multipotent mesenchymal stem or stromal cells (MSC) have shown to improve outcome of acute renal injury models, but whether MSC can delay renal failure in chronic kidney disease is not known. We injected primary MSC or saline into mice that lack the alpha 3-chain of type IV collagen (COL4A3), a model of chronic kidney disease with close similarities to human Alport disease. Weekly injections of MSC from week 6 to 10 of life prevented the loss of peritubular capillaries and reduced markers of renal fibrosis, that is, interstitial volume, numbers of smooth muscle actin-positive interstitial cells, and interstitial collagen deposits as compared to saline-injected COL4A3-deficient mice. However, renal function, that is, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine levels, proteinuria as well as survival of COL4A3-deficient mice were not affected by MSC injections. Although MSC were found to localize to kidneys of COL4A3-deficient mice after injection, differentiation into renal cells was not detected. However, MSC expressed growth factors, that is, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and bone morphogenetic protein-7 under basal culture conditions. In fact, VEGF mRNA levels were increased in kidneys of MSC-injected COL4A3-deficient mice and MSC supernatants enhance endothelial cell proliferation in vitro. Thus, weekly injections with MSC prevent loss of peritubular capillaries possibly owing to local production of growth factors rather than by differentiation into renal cells. The maintenance of interstitial vasculature is associated with less interstitial fibrosis but, is insufficient to delay renal failure and survival of COL4A3-deficient mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据