4.6 Article

Morphologic analyses of mandible and upper airway soft tissue by MRI of patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome

期刊

SLEEP
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 909-915

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/29.7.909

关键词

obstructive sleep apnoea; 3D MRI; Japanese; mandible; tongue volume; soft palate volume; lateral pharyngeal wall

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: To evaluate the morphological features of the mandible and the volume of the upper airway soft tissues in determining the anatomical risk factors for the upper airway in Japanese male patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods: Five morphological parameters of the mandible at the mandibular base plane and three volumetric parameters of the upper airway soft tissue were analyzed using three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging software in 31 OSAHS and 20 controls. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in mandibular internal width (the distance between the internal right and left gonia [IRG and ILG]) and mandibular bony thickness. However, the patients with OSAHS had a significantly wider mandibular divergence (the angle between the spina mentalis (SM)-IRG line and SM-ILG line), a smaller mandibular internal length (the perpendicular distance from SM to the RG-LG line), and a smaller area than the normal subjects at the mandibular base plane, There were no significant differences in these morphological parameters for the mandible between obese and nonobese OSAHS patients. The volumes of the tongue, soft palate, and lateral pharyngeal walls were not significantly different between the OSAHS and the control groups. Conclusions: Japanese male OSAHS patients had specific anatomical features in the bottom part of the mandible; however, obesity seemed to be a less significant risk factor. Investigators and clinicians must realize that ethnicity may modify the effects of obesity and abnormal craniofacial anatomy as risk factors for the pathogenesis of OSAHS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据