4.4 Article

Diminished nicotine withdrawal in adolescent rats: implications for vulnerability to addiction

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 186, 期 4, 页码 612-619

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0383-6

关键词

adolescence; development; nicotine; dependence; withdrawal; rat

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R56 DA011946, DA11946] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhanced reinforcing effects of nicotine during adolescence appear to contribute to the rapid development of dependence in this age group. However, the contribution of nicotine withdrawal to dependence in adolescents is unclear. We compared motivational and somatic signs of nicotine withdrawal in adolescent and adult rats. In experiment 1, motivational signs of nicotine withdrawal were compared using intracranial self-stimulation procedures after administration of mecamylamine (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.) in adolescent and adult rats made dependent on nicotine (9 mg/kg/day). Somatic signs of withdrawal were compared in two experiments using various doses of nicotine (adolescent doses: 0, 1.6, 3.2, 4.7 mg/kg/day; adult doses: 0, 1, 2.1, 3.2 mg/kg/day, expressed as nicotine base) to produce dependence and one dose of mecamylamine (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.) to precipitate withdrawal (experiment 2) and in a subsequent experiment, using various doses of mecamylamine (0, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) to precipitate withdrawal and a dose of nicotine (adolescent dose: 4.7 mg/kg/day; adult dose: 3.2 mg/kg/day) that produced equivalent nicotine blood levels in these age groups (experiment 3). Adolescents did not display the decreases in brain reward function observed in adults experiencing withdrawal, and displayed fewer somatic signs of nicotine withdrawal relative to adults regardless of the dosing procedure used. The negative effects of nicotine withdrawal are lower during adolescence relative to later periods of development. Both the enhanced rewarding effects and the diminished nicotine withdrawal likely contribute to the rapid development of nicotine use during adolescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据