4.6 Article

Smoking related COPD and facial wrinkling: is there a common susceptibility?

期刊

THORAX
卷 61, 期 7, 页码 568-571

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2005.053827

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [G0500306] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0500306] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G0500306] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cigarette smoking causes accelerated facial wrinkling and predisposes to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD). However, it has long been recognised that there is a subgroup of susceptible smokers who are at increased risk of developing airflow obstruction. We have tested the hypothesis that there is a common susceptibility for the development of COPD and facial wrinkling in cigarette smokers. Methods: One hundred and forty nine current and ex-smokers were recruited from a family based study of COPD genetics, 68 (45.6%) of whom fulfilled the definition of COPD. 124 (83.2%) had no or minor facial wrinkling (Daniell < IV) and 25 (16.8%) were wrinkled (Daniell score >= IV). Generalised estimating equations were used to adjust for familial correlations between related individuals and the potential confounding effects of age and pack years smoked. Results: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was significantly lower in those with wrinkles than in those without (mean difference in FEV1 % predicted -13.7%, 95% CI -27.5 to 0.0, p = 0.05) and facial wrinkling was associated with a substantially increased risk of COPD ( adjusted OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.3 to 18.5, p < 0.02). The Daniell score correlated with the extent of emphysema on the CT scan (p < 0.05) and facial wrinkling was also associated with a greater risk of more extensive emphysema (adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.0 to 9.3, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Facial wrinkling is associated with COPD in smokers, and both disease processes may share a common susceptibility. Facial wrinkling in smokers may therefore be a biomarker of susceptibility to COPD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据