4.4 Article

An analysis of SEER data of increasing risk of secondary malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of childhood brain tumors

期刊

PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 83-88

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.20690

关键词

childhood brain tumors; late effects; secondary malignant neoplasm (SMN); surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Advances made in treatment of a childhood brain cancer have extended the lives of many children and adolescents. Treatment success, however, brings the opportunity to assess late effects; most worrying among these are secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN). Even though the cumulative incidence is quite small, long-term follow-up is required because treatment-induced cancers can occur years after initial treatment. Procedure: The purpose of this project was to determine what treatments and what host characteristics of children treated for a primary brain cancer are associated with an increase in the risk of a SMN in long-term survivors. Data were analyzed from 2,056 5-year survivors, of primary brain cancer in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database between 1973 and 1998. Thirty-nine patients developed a SMN. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the independent contribution of a number of risk factors. Results: The most important risk factor for developing a SMN in 5-year survivors was the era in which the primary cancer was treated. Compared to treatment prior to 1979, patients treated between 1979 and 1984 had a 4.7-fold increase in risk (P=0.001), while those treated after 1985 had a 6.7-fold increase in risk. (P=0.002). Patients treated most recently carry the greatest risk of SMN development even after controlling for radiotherapy. This could be due to the increase in intensive treatment compared to earlier years. Conclusion: Although the absolute excess risk of SMN remains quite low, continued surveillance is needed to evaluate long-term effects of new therapies for primary brain tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据