4.6 Article

Type Ia supernova diversity in three-dimensional models

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 453, 期 1, 页码 203-U15

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053430

关键词

stars : supernovae : general; hydrodynamics; nuclear reactions,nucleosynthesis, abundances; methods : numerical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. The use of type Ia supernovae as distance indicators for cosmology has initiated a search for theoretical arguments supporting the empirical calibration methods applied. As a first step, a sound understanding of the origin of the observed diversity in type Ia supernova properties is needed. Aims. Here we present a systematic study of effects resulting from changing some physical parameters of three-dimensional deflagration models of thermonuclear supernovae. Methods. The high computational costs of such models restricted this survey to simple setups which are known to result in weak explosions and therefore we point out trends rather then setting the absolute scale of the variance. In our study we vary the progenitor's carbon-to-oxygen ratio and its central density prior to ignition because both properties are not well determined by stellar evolution theory and they may change from supernova to supernova. Next we compute for these explosion models the nucleosynthesis yields in a post-processing step. This, in addition, allows us to study variations in the progenitor's metallicity by means of different Ne-22 mass fractions in the initial composition. Results. We find that the progenitor's carbon-to-oxygen ratio and its central density affect the energy release of the models and thus the expansion velocity of the supernova. Moreover, we find that changing the metallicity and the central density changes the production of radioactive Ni-56 and thus affects the luminosity. In contrast, the carbon-to-oxygen ratio has little effect on the Ni-56 production. Conclusions. Implications of the variations of the explosion energy and the produced Ni-56 mass for type Ia supernova diversity are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据