4.6 Article

Spatial working memory as a cognitive endophenotype of schizophrenia: Assessing risk for pathophysiological dysfunction

期刊

SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 498-506

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbj072

关键词

relative risk; genetics; schizotypy

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH49826, MH40279, R01 MH049826] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research suggests that first-degree relatives and individuals with schizophrenia spectrum personality disorders (SSPD) may represent nonpenetrant carriers of the genetic diathesis for schizophrenia. This study examined visuospatial working memory (SWM) as a cognitive endophenotype of schizophrenia by expanding the concept of risk for pathophysiological dysfunction beyond overt psychosis. Risk was thus defined by familial status and the presence or absence of SSPD. SWM was assessed in the following groups, in order of decreasing likelihood of genetic vulnerability: 23 patients with schizophrenia, 17 SSPD relatives of patients with schizophrenia, 23 non-SSPD relatives of patients with schizophrenia, 14 SSPD community members with no family history of psychosis, and 36 non-SSPD community members. SWM performance during a computer task was quantified by A-Prime. Relative risk ratios for SWM deficits were compared among the groups. Compared with community non-SSPD volunteers, relative risk (RR) of SWM deficits was significantly elevated in patients with schizophrenia (RR = 3.76, p = .002) and SSPD family members (RR = 2.97, p = .027), but not in the family non-SSPD (RR = 1.88, p = .241) or community SSPD (RR = 1.03, p = .971) groups. The pattern of SWM performance deficits reflected the proposed model of latent genetic liability, upholding SWM as a viable cognitive endophenotype. The results underscore the importance of including both familial liability and the schizophrenia spectrum when considering risk for schizophrenia and schizophrenia-related traits. This is particularly relevant for research efforts to identify pathophysiological components of the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据