4.3 Article

Production and partial characterization of extracellular peroxidase produced by Streptomyces sp F6616 isolated in Turkey

期刊

ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 323-334

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/BF03178335

关键词

lignocellulose; peroxidase; Streptomyces; 2,4-dichlorophenol; oat spelt xylan

资金

  1. Technical and Scientific Research Council of Turkey [TBAG2056(101T066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streptomyces sp. F6616 was found to produce higher levels of extracellular peroxidase activity (0.535 U/mL) without any inducers than other actinobacteria which are previously reported. Maximum specific peroxidase activity (6.21 U/mg of protein) was obtained after 72 h of incubation at 30 degrees C in a minimal salt medium (pH 8.0) containing (in wt/v) 0.6% yeast extract and 0.8% ball-milled wheat straw corresponding to a C:N ratio of 4.6:1. Characterization of the peroxidase revealed that the optimal temperature for the enzyme activity, using the standard 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) assay was 50 degrees C, when the enzyme reaction was performed at pH 8.0. A study of the effect of temperature on the stability of peroxidase over time, showed that the enzyme was stable at 50 degrees C, with a half-life of 145 min, while at higher temperature the stability and activity was reduced such that at 60 degrees C the half-life of the enzyme was 30 min. The optimum pH for the activity of the enzyme occurred between pH 9.0 and 10.0. The apparent K-m and V-max values for the peroxidase preparations were determined to be 1.52 mmol/L and 1.84 U/mg protein, respectively using 2,4-DCP as a substrate. Characterization of the peroxidase activity revealed activity against 2,4-DCP, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), 2,4,5-trichlorophenol and other chlorophenols in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. However, inhibition of peroxidase activity with the addition of potassium cyanide and sodium azide, suggested the presence of heme component in the tertiary structure of the enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据