4.5 Review

Aridity influence on vegetation patterns in the middle Ebro Valley (Spain): Evaluation by means of AVHRR images and climate interpolation techniques

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 353-375

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.10.021

关键词

remote sensing; NDVI; temporal variability of vegetation; regression-based interpolation; land cover types; Mediterranean region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyses the role of climatic aridity on the spatial differences of vegetation activity and its inter-annual variability in a semi-arid region of the North East of the Iberian Peninsula. The vegetation activity was quantified by means of a monthly Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) database from NOAA-AVHRR satellite images (1987-2000) at 1 km(2) of spatial resolution. Coefficients of variation (CoV) from temporal NDVI series were also calculated. The greater temporal variability of NDVI was recorded in areas with low vegetation cover (steppe and dry farming lands), whereas the lowest temporal variability of NDVI was recorded in the irrigated lands and forests located in the most humid areas. There is a strong and negative relationship between the CoV and the NDVI distribution, but we recorded important differences among land uses. Using maps of annual precipitation and temperature obtained by means of a regression-based method, we studied the influence of aridity on spatial patterns of NDVI and CoV values. The results show the high influence of aridity on the spatial distribution of vegetation activity in the Middle Ebro Valley. Aridity causes a general decrease of NDVI and an increase of CoV. Nevertheless, non-linear relationships between aridity and NDVI and CoV were recorded for the whole of the study area and for the different land uses. The relationships between aridity and vegetation patterns in the semi-arid region studied are discussed in depth. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据