4.6 Article

Common variation in NOS1AP and KCNH2 genes and QT interval duration in young adults. The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study

期刊

ANNALS OF MEDICINE
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 144-151

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07853890802392529

关键词

Arrhythmia; electrocardiography; genetics; QT interval

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [77841, 210283]
  2. Social Insurance Institution of Finland
  3. Turku University Foundation
  4. Juho Vainio Foundation
  5. Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  6. Finnish Foundation of Cardiovascular Research
  7. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  8. Federal funds
  9. Maud Kuistila Foundation
  10. Tampere University Hospital Medical Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Common genetic variants in the nitric oxide synthase 1 adaptor protein gene (NOS1AP) and in the HERG potassium channel gene (KCNH2) have been associated with cardiac repolarization in middle-aged and elderly subjects. Aim: We examined the relation between these variants and QT interval duration in a population of healthy young adults. Methods: We measured QT interval duration and genotyped rs10494366 TG (NOS1AP gene, n=1,842) and rs1805123 AC (KCNH2 gene, n=1,894) in subjects aged 24-39 years. Results: The NOS1AP variant was significantly related with heart rate-corrected QT interval duration (QTc). Additive regression model adjusting for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, alcohol use, and smoking indicated that the G allele was associated with a 3.2 ms (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-4.6 ms, P0.0001) increase in QTc interval duration for each additional copy. The KCNH2 variant was not significantly related with QTc interval duration in the study sample. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence from a population of healthy young adults that a common variation in the NOS1AP gene influences cardiac repolarization within the normal physiological range. Further studies are warranted to investigate the effects of this variant on sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据