4.5 Article

Extractability and chromatographic separation of rice endosperm proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
卷 44, 期 1, 页码 68-74

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2006.03.005

关键词

SE-HPLC; rice protein; glutelin subunits; disulfide bonds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular weight (MW) distribution of proteins extracted with different solvents from defatted rice endosperm was examined by size exclusion-high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC) with 2.0% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (w/v) as mobile phase. The resulting protein peaks were further characterized by SDS-PAGE. Under the experimental conditions, 2.0% SDS extracted 64% of the proteins. Adding 6.0 M urea resulted in a 15% increase in extractability (up to 79%). With using 20-100 mM NaOH, 70-81% of the proteins were extractable. Maximum extractability was reached with 2.0% SDS, 6.0 M urea and 0.5-1.5% dithiothreitol (DTT). Apparent MW profiles of rice endosperm proteins allowed classification into six fractions of decreasing apparent MW. Fraction Vi contained the low MW albumin, globulin, and prolamin protein material. Fractions IV and V originated from alpha and beta glutelin subunits, respectively. The polypeptides of fraction III consisted of an alpha and a beta subunit linked by an intermolecular disulfide bond. The polypeptides of fractions I and II were dimers, trimers or more highly polymerized forms of the (alpha-beta) glutelin subunit dimer in fraction III. While the work confirmed that rice glutelin is composed of polymers of alpha and subunits, remarkably, higher MW glutelin aggregates (fractions I-III) only partly dissociated on reduction. Low MW protein material (fraction VI) was entrapped in the aggregated protein network and was released on reduction. The rapid and reproducible SE-HPLC method developed for rice protein separation allows a more quantitative approach than SDS-PAGE. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据