4.8 Article

Altered colonic glycoprotein expression in unaffected monozygotic twins of inflammatory bowel disease patients

期刊

GUT
卷 55, 期 7, 页码 973-977

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2005.086413

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: Previous chromatographic analysis of colonic mucins from monozygotic twins with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) suggested a genetic mucin alteration in ulcerative colitis (UC). This study explores this further by assessing mucosal expression of the oncofetal carbohydrate antigen TF (galactose beta 1, 3 N-acetylgalactosamine alpha-), among the same IBD twins. Materials and methods: Formalin fixed paraffin embedded rectal biopsies were studied from 22 monozygotic twin pairs with IBD. These included eight UC twin pairs and 14 Crohn's disease (CD) twin pairs, with six pairs concordant for disease and 16 unaffected twin siblings. Closely adjacent sections were assessed by peanut lectin histochemistry for TF expression and immunohistochemically for nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa B) activation with investigators blinded to the diagnosis. Results: Unaffected twins were almost all TF positive (15/16) compared with 5/29 histologically normal controls (p < 0.0001). Unaffected UC (7/8) and CD twins (8/8) were similarly TF positive. TF positivity was confined mainly to the superficial epithelium and absent from the stem cell compartment of the lower crypts, suggesting that glycosylation changes are acquired rather than genetically determined. Activated NF kappa B was present in the surface epithelium of mucosal biopsies from 13/14 unaffected IBD twins but in only 6/22 histologically normal controls (p=0.0004). All 22 affected IBD twins were TF positive and 18 were positive for activated NF kappa B. Conclusions: Altered mucosal glycosylation in unaffected identical twins of IBD patients was confirmed in this study. This occurred in both UC and CD twins. The changes are probably acquired rather than congenital and may reflect preinflammatory NF kappa B activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据