4.5 Review

Nosocomial aspergillosis in outbreak settings

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
卷 63, 期 3, 页码 246-254

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.02.014

关键词

aspergillus outbreaks; aspergillus; environmental air sampling/culturing; immunocompromised hosts; outbreak investigations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nosocomial aspergillosis represents a serious threat for severely immunocompromised patients and numerous outbreaks of invasive aspergillosis have been described. This systematic review summarizes characteristics and mortality rates of infected patients, distribution of Aspergillus spp. in clinical specimens, concentrations of aspergillus spores in volumetric air samples, and outbreak sources. A web-based register of nosocomial epidemics (outbreak database), PubMed and reference lists of relevant articles were searched systematically for descriptions of aspergillus outbreaks in hospital settings. Fifty-three studies with a total of 458 patients were included. In 356 patients, the lower respiratory tract was the primary site of aspergillus infection. Species identified most often were Aspergillus fumigatus (154 patients) and Aspergillus flavus (101 patients). Haematological malignancies were the predominant underlying diseases (299 individuals). The overall fatality rate in these 299 patients (57.6%) was significantly greater than that in patients without severe immunodeficiency (39.4% of 38 individuals). Construction or demolition work was often (49.1%) considered to be the probable or possible source of the outbreak. Even concentrations of Aspergillus spp. below 1 colony-forming unit/m(3) were sufficient to cause infection in high-risk patients. Virtually all outbreaks of nosocomial aspergillosis are attributed to airborne sources, usually construction. Even small concentrations of spores have been associated with outbreaks, mainly due to A. fumigatus or A. flavus. Patients at risk should not be exposed to aspergilli. (c) 2006 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据