4.4 Article

Molecular dissection of venom from Chinese scorpion Mesobuthus martensii:: Identification and characterization of four novel disulfide-bridged venom peptides

期刊

PEPTIDES
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 1745-1754

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.01.012

关键词

Mesobuthus martensii; Buthus martensii karsch; scorpion toxins; Na+-channel; K+-channel; cDNA library

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scorpion venom is composed of a large repertoire of biologically active polypeptides. However, most of these peptides remain to be identified and characterized. in this paper, we report the identification and characterization of four novel disulfide-bridged venom peptides (named BmKBTx, BmKITx, BmKKx1 and BmKKx2, respectively) from the Chinese scorpion, Mesobuthus martensii (also named Buthus martensii Karsch). BmKBTx is composed of 58 amino acid residues and cross-linked by three disulfide bridges. The sequence of BmKBTx: shows some similarities to that of the toxin, birtoxin, and its analogs. It is likely that BmKBTx is a p-toxin active on Na+ channels, which is toxic to either insects or mammals. BmKITx is composed of 71 amino acid residues with four disulfide bridges. It is the longest venom peptide identified from M. martensii so far. BmKITx shows little sequence identity with scorpion alpha-toxins toxic to insects. It is likely that BmKITx is a new type of Na+-channel specific toxin active on both insects and mammals. BmKKx1 contains 38 amino acid residues cross-linked by three disulfide bridges and shows 84% sequence identity with BmTx3, an inhibitor of A-type K+ channel and HERG currents. BmKKx1 has been classified as alpha-KTx-15.8. BmKKx2 is composed of 36 residues and stabilized by three disulfide bridges. BmKKx2 is a new member of the gamma-K+-channel toxin subfamily (classified as gamma-KTx 2.2). The venoms of scorpions thus continue to provide novel toxins with potential novel actions on targets. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据