4.7 Article

Polymorphisms in the advanced glycosylation end product-specific receptor gene and risk of incident myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke

期刊

STROKE
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 1686-1690

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000226994.93914.6c

关键词

genetics; polymorphism; risk factors

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-58755, HL-63293] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-064841] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Recent findings of an association between polymorphisms of advanced glycosylation end product-specific receptor (AGER) and risk of diabetic vasculopathy have generated great interest. However, to date, no genetic-epidemiological data are available on risk of atherothrombotic events among nondiabetic populations. Methods-Using DNA samples collected at baseline in a prospective cohort of 14 916 initially healthy American men, we evaluated 3 AGER genetic variants: -429T > C, -374T > A, and Gly82Ser, among 600 white individuals who subsequently developed atherothrombotic event (incident myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke) and among 600 age- and smoking-matched white individuals who remained free of reported vascular disease during follow-up (controls). Results-Genotype distributions for the polymorphisms tested were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Haplotype-based conditional logistic regression, adjusting for other potential confounders, showed that haplotype C-T-Gly (myocardial infarction: odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.90; P = 0.01) and haplotype T-A-Gly (ischemic stroke: OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.99; P = 0.05), compared with the reference haplotype T-T-Gly, were associated with reduced risk of atherothrombosis. Prespecified analysis limited to those without baseline history of diabetes showed similar significant findings. Conclusions-We found an association of specific AGER promoter gene haplotypes with reduced risk of incident myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke that was independent of the presence of diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据