4.4 Article

On and off membrane dynamics of the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi tethering factor p115 in vivo

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 2996-3008

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E05-09-0862

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms regulating membrane recruitment of the p115 tethering factor in vivo are unknown. Here, we describe cycling of p115 between membranes and cytosol and document the effects of Golgi matrix proteins, Rab1, and soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein (SNAP) receptors (SNAREs) on this process. Rapid membrane/cytosol exchange is shown by swift (t(1/2) similar to 20 s) loss of Golgi-localized p115-green fluorescent protein (GFP) after repeated photobleaching of cell periphery and rapid (t(1/2) similar to 13 s) fluorescence recovery after photobleaching Golgi-localized p115-GFP. p115 mutant missing the GM130/giantin binding site exhibits analogous fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) (t(1/2) similar to 13 s), suggesting that GM130 and giantin are not major determinants of p115 membrane dynamics. In contrast, p115-GFP exchanges more rapidly (t(1,2) similar to 8 s) in cells expressing the inactive Rab1/N121I mutant, indicating that p115 cycling is influenced by Rab1. p115-GFP dynamics is also influenced by the assembly status of SNAREs. In cells expressing an ATPase-deficient NSF/E329Q mutant that inhibits SNARE complex disassembly, the cycling kinetics of p115-GFP are significantly slower (t(1,2) similar to 21 s). In contrast, in cells incubated at reduced temperature (10 degrees C) that inhibits vesicular traffic, the cycling kinetics of p115-GFP are faster (t(1/2) similar to 7 s). These data suggest that p115-binding sites on the membrane are provided by unassembled SNAREs. In agreement, biochemical studies show increased p115 recruitment to membranes in the presence of NSF and alpha-SNAP. Our data support a model in which recruitment of tethers is directly regulated by the assembly status of SNAREs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据