4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Inhibition of toll-like receptor 4 with eritoran attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 I270-I274

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.000901

关键词

ischemia; myocardial infarction; reperfusion; signal transduction

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [5R01HL061762] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-We previously reported that the functional mutation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in C3H/HeJ mice subjected to myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (MI/R) injury resulted in an attenuation of myocardial infarction size. To investigate the ligand-activating TLR4 during MI/R injury, we evaluated the effect of eritoran, a specific TLR4 antagonist, on MI/R injury, with the goal of defining better therapeutic options for MI/R injury. Methods and Results-C57BL/6 mice received eritoran (5 mg/kg) intravenously 10 minutes before 30 minutes of in situ of transient occlusion of the left anterior descending artery, followed by 120 minutes of reperfusion. Infarct size was measured using triphenyltetrazoliumchloride staining. A c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) activation was determined by Western blotting, nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B activity was detected by gel-shift assay, and cytokine expression was measured by ribonuclease protection assay. Mice treated with eritoran developed significantly smaller infarcts when compared with mice treated with vehicle alone (21.0 +/- 6.4% versus 30.9 +/- 13.9%; P = 0.041). Eritoran pretreatment resulted in a reduction in JNK phosphorylation (eritoran versus vehicle: 3.98 +/- 0.81 versus 7.01 +/- 2.21-fold increase; P = 0.020), less nuclear NF-kappa B translocation (2.70 +/- 0.35 versus 7.75 +/- 0.60-fold increase; P = 0.00007), and a decrease in cytokine expression (P < 0.05). Conclusions-We conclude that inhibition of TLR4 with eritoran in an in situ murine model significantly reduces MI/R injury and markers of an inflammatory response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据