4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Functional growth in tissue-engineered living, vascular grafts -: Follow-up at 100 weeks in a large animal model

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 I159-I166

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001172

关键词

tissue engineering; growth; pulmonary artery; cells; scaffolds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Living autologous vascular grafts with the capacity for regeneration and growth may overcome the limitations of contemporary artificial prostheses. Particularly in congenital cardiovascular surgery, there is an unmet medical need for growing replacement materials. Here we investigate growth capacity of tissue-engineered living pulmonary arteries in a growing lamb model. Methods and Results-Vascular grafts fabricated from biodegradable scaffolds (ID 18 +/- 1 mm) were sequentially seeded with vascular cells. The seeded constructs were grown in vitro for 21days using biomimetic conditions. Thereafter, these tissue-engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) were surgically implanted as main pulmonary artery replacements in 14 lambs using cardiopulmonary bypass and followed up for <= 100 weeks. The animals more than doubled their body weight during the 2-year period. The TEVG showed good functional performance demonstrated by regular echocardiography at 20, 50, 80, and 100 weeks and computed tomography-angiography. In particular, there was no evidence of thrombus, calcification, stenosis, suture dehiscence, or aneurysm. There was a significant increase in diameter by 30% and length by 45%. Histology showed tissue formation reminiscent of native artery. Biochemical analysis revealed cellularity and proteoglycans and increased collagen contents in all of the groups, analogous to those of native vessels. The mechanical profiles of the TEVG showed stronger but less elastic tissue properties than native pulmonary arteries. Conclusions-This study provides evidence of growth in living, functional pulmonary arteries engineered from vascular cells in a full growth animal model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据