4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of monomolecular DNA G-quadruplexes formed by tetra-end-linked oligonucleotides

期刊

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 889-898

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bc060009b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Guanine-rich DNA sequences are widely dispersed in the eukaryotic genome and are abundant in regions with relevant biological significance. They can form quadruplex structures stabilized by guanine quartets. These structures differ for number and strand polarity, loop composition, and conformation. We report here the syntheses and the structural studies of a set of interconnected d(TG(4)T) fragments which are tethered, with different orientations, to a tetra-end-linker in an attempt to force the formation of specific four-stranded DNA quadruplex structures. Two synthetic strategies have been used to obtain oligodeoxyribonucleotide (ODN) strands linked with their 3'-or 5'- ends to each of the four arms of the linker. The first approach allowed the synthesis of tetra-end-linked ODN (TEL-ODN) containing the four ODN strands with a parallel orientation, while the latter synthetic pathway led to the synthesis of TEL-ODNs each containing antiparallel ODN pairs. The influence of the linker at 3'- or 5'- ODN, on the quadruplex typology and stability, in the presence of sodium or potassium ions, has been investigated by circular dichroism (CD), CD thermal denaturation, H-1 NMR experiments at variable temperature, and molecular modeling. All synthesized TEL-ODNs formed parallel G-quadruplex structures. Particularly, the TEL-ODN containing all parallel ODN tracts formed very stable parallel G-quadruplex complexes, whereas the TEL-ODNs containing antiparallel ODN pairs led to relatively less stable parallel G-quadruplexes. The molecular modeling data suggested that the above antiparallel TEL-ODNs can adopt parallel G-quadruplex structures thanks to a considerable folding of the tetra-end-linker around the whole quadruplex scaffold.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据