4.6 Article

Fast, comprehensive online two-dimensional high performance liquid chromatography through the use of high temperature ultra-fast gradient elution reversed-phase liquid chromatography

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1122, 期 1-2, 页码 123-137

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.04.058

关键词

two-dimensional HPLC; high temperature HPLC; ultra-fast gradient elution HPLC; peak capacity; metabolomics

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 54585] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new approach to high speed, comprehensive online dual gradient elution 2DLC (LC x LC) based on the use of ultra-fast, high temperature gradient elution reversed phase chromatography is described. Entirely conventional gradient elution instrumentation and columns are assembled in a system which develops a total peak capacity of about 900 in 25 min; this is equivalent to roughly one peak/2 s. Each second dimension gradient is done in a cycle time of 21 s and the peak retention times measured for a set of twenty six indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) derivatives are reproducible to 0.2 s. Each peak eluting from the first dimension column is sampled at least twice across its width, as the corresponding peaks on the second dimension column appear in two or three consecutive second dimension chromatograms, clearly indicating that there is little loss in the resolution gained in the first dimension separation. Application to the separation of the low molecular weight components of wild-type and mutant maize seedlings indicates the presence of about 100 peaks on a timescale of 25 min. Compelling illustrations of the analytical potential of fast, high temperature 2DLC are evident in the clear presence of nine distinct peaks in a single second dimension chromatogram from a single quite narrow first dimension peak, and the great power of 2DLC to solve the analytic dynamic range problem inherent in the measurement of small peaks that are neighbors to a gigantic peak. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据