4.6 Article

Neurofiberscopic biopsy of tumors of the pineal region and posterior third ventricle: Indications, technique, complications, and results

期刊

NEUROSURGERY
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 267-276

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000223504.29243.0B

关键词

complications; indications; neurofiberscopic biopsy; outcome; pineal tumor; technique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of results of the neurofiberscopic biopsy of tumors of the pineal region and posterior third ventricle. METHODS: From 2001 to 2004, 23 patients (mean age, 30.6 yr) with tumors located in the pineal region or posterior third ventricle underwent neurofiberscopic biopsy with simultaneous third ventriculostomy. The procedure was indicated for verification of the histological diagnosis of the neoplasm, which was planned to be treated by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy without open surgery (eight patients), establishment of the pathological diagnosis for further choice of the most appropriate treatment strategy (11 patients), differentiation of the recurrent neoplasm and radiation necrosis (two patients), and decompression of the large tumor-associated cyst (two patients). In six previously shunted patients, substitution of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt on the third ventricle stoma was performed. RESULTS: There was no postoperative mortality or permanent morbidity. in all cases, the obtained tissue sample was sufficient for pathological diagnosis. Transient postoperative complications included-fever (15 patients), nausea and vomiting (three patients), and diplopia (one patient). On the long-term follow-up, delayed third ventricular stoma failure caused by tumor regrowth and scar formation was found in one patient, and dissemination of the malignant glioma through the subarachnoid space was found in another patient. CONCLUSION: Neurofiberscopic biopsy rep-resents a useful method for sampling of tumors of the pineal region and posterior third ventricle, which can be effectively used in both previously shunted and shunt-free patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据