4.8 Article

Identification and characterization of a lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase in alveolar type II cells

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0604946103

关键词

biochemistry; lung; surfactant; phosphatidylcholine

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P50 HL056387, HL-56387, HL-29891] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulmonary surfactant is a complex of lipids and proteins produced and secreted by alveolar type 11 cells that provides the low surface tension at the air-liquid interface. The phospholipid most responsible for providing the low surface tension in the lung is dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine. Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine is synthesized in large part by phosphatidylcholine (PC) remodeling, and a lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC) acyltransferase is thought to play a critical role in its synthesis. However, this acyltransferase has not yet been identified. We have cloned full-length rat and mouse cDNAs coding for a lysoPC acyltransferase (LPCAT). LPCAT encodes a 535-aa protein of approximate to 59 kDa that contains a transmembrane domain and a putative acyltransferase domain. When transfected into COS-7 cells and HEK293 cells, LPCAT significantly increased lysoPC acyltransferase activity. LPCAT preferred lysoPC as a substrate over lysoPA, lysoPI, lysoPS, lysoPE, or lysoPG and prefers palmitoyl-CoA to oleoyl-CoA as the acyl donor. This LPCAT was preferentially expressed in the lung, specifically within alveolar type 11 cells. Expression in the fetal lung and in rat type 11 cells correlated with the expression of the surfactant proteins. LPCAT expression in fetal lung explants was sensitive to dexamethasone and FGFs. KGF was a potent stimulator of LPCAT expression in cultured adult type 11 cells. We hypothesize that LPCAT plays a critical role in regulating surfactant phospholipid biosynthesis and suggest that understanding the regulation of LPCAT will offer important insight into surfactant phospholipid biosynthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据