4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A solid-state NMR, FT-IR and TPD study on acid properties of sulfated and metal-promoted zirconia: Influence of promoter and sulfation treatment

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 116, 期 2, 页码 111-120

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2006.01.025

关键词

sulfated zirconia; metal promoter; acidity; solid-state P-31 NMR; pyridine-IR; NH3-TPD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The acid properties of various sulfated and metal-promoted zirconium oxide (ZrO2) catalysts have been studied by solid-state P-31 MAS NMR, FT-IR and TPD using the adsorbed trimethylphosphine oxide (TWO), pyridine and ammonia as the probe molecule, respectively. Sulfated zirconia (SZ) catalysts having varied sulfur contents and metal promoter (M = At, Ga and Fe) were prepared by sol-gel method. Effects of sulfation and promoter on the detailed qualitative and quantitative information of acid sites, viz. types (Bronsted versus Lewis), strengths and distributions, on various synthesized SZ and M/SZ were examined by P-31 MAS NMR of adsorbed TWO in conjunction with elemental analyses by ICP-MS. By comparison, pyridine-IR and NH3-TPD methods are capable of providing only qualitative information of the overall acidity. It was found that while the parent ZrO2 possesses only weak Lewis acidities, elaborated sulfation treatment leads to formation and coexistence of strong Bronsted (B) and Lewis (L) acid sites whose variations can readily be followed. On the other hand, incorporation of different metal promoters onto SZ, led to simultaneous formation/elimination and variations of B- and L-sites with varied strengths and distributions. As a result, Ga/SZ was found to possess more B- than L-sites, whereas an opposite trend was observed for Al/SZ. As for Fe/SZ, a pronounced increase in both concentration and strength of acid sites were found. With an exception of Ga/SZ, the 'very strong' acid sites observed for various SZ and M/SZ catalysts were found to be associated more to L- than B-sites. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据